BackUnderstanding the limitations of digital tools in mineral monitoring is crucial for accurate mine planning. This video explores how geological sampling leads to contradictions, why computer models are approximations, and why the real truth about mineral deposits is only revealed through actual mining operations.
Video transcription
The mining industry increasingly relies on digital tools, blockchain, and database-driven models to monitor mineral resources. However, despite their sophistication, these technologies have inherent limitations.
Drill hole databases contain thousands of samples, but no two are ever identical. Each sample contradicts the next, leading to inevitable inaccuracies. Even when new drill holes are placed next to previous ones, the variations in data persist. This discrepancy means that models and databases are not absolute truths but rather approximations of reality.
The actual truth about mineral deposits only emerges when the ore is mined and processed through the plant. Even at this stage, discrepancies continue—what is sold as a concentrate may contain unexpected contaminants, affecting its market value. The price of minerals is ultimately determined by human perception, contracts, and agreements rather than the absolute properties of the material itself.
This discussion highlights a fundamental challenge: while digital tools improve efficiency, they cannot replace real-world mining results. The industry must recognize these limitations and approach data-driven decision-making with caution.
Subscribe to newsletter 
Follow K-MINE on LinkedIn