BackExplore comprehensive strategies for effectively managing geotechnical risks in open-pit mining. This webinar covers essential methods for risk identification, advanced geotechnical data collection and analysis, slope stability techniques including numerical modeling, and cost-effective stabilization measures. Learn how proactive emergency response planning can significantly enhance safety, reduce downtime, and maintain operational efficiency.
Video transcription
Understanding Geotechnical Risks
Geotechnical risks are hazards arising from unstable ground conditions, including landslides, ground subsidence, groundwater-induced failures, and seismic impacts. Identifying these risks early prevents accidents and operational downtime, forming the foundation for a secure mining environment.
Identification of Risks
Common geotechnical risks include slope instability, subsidence, groundwater issues, and seismic activity. Effective identification relies on historical records, visual inspections, geological and hydrogeological mapping, and risk registers. Digital tools like slope stability analysis enhance accuracy and foresight.
Geotechnical Data Collection
Accurate geotechnical analysis depends on thorough data collection via borehole drilling, core sampling, laboratory tests, and in-situ methods like cone penetration testing (CPT). Structural mapping, geophysical surveys, and Rock Quality Designation (RQD) assessments complement these methods, offering a comprehensive geological understanding.
Data Documentation and Analysis
Proper documentation in digital databases and 3D geological models facilitates seamless integration with stability analysis software, enabling rapid updates and precise modeling for improved slope management.
Factor of Safety (FoS) in Stability Analysis
The Factor of Safety quantifies slope stability by comparing resisting forces against driving forces. Typically, permanent slopes require a FoS between 1.2-1.3, with rigorous methods like limit equilibrium and numerical modeling employed for thorough assessments.
Analytical Methods: Limit Equilibrium and Numerical Modeling
Limit equilibrium methods (LEM), including techniques by Fellenius and Bishop, assess predefined slip surfaces. Numerical modeling, such as Finite Element Method (FEM), provides detailed stress and deformation analyses, essential for complex geological conditions.
Practical Stabilization Measures
Cost-effective stabilization includes water management through drainage systems, geometrical slope reshaping, surface reinforcement with vegetation or geosynthetics, and localized structures like gabions and soil nails. Early intervention and proactive strategies significantly reduce risk and expense.
Emergency Response and Monitoring
Robust monitoring systems using radar, extensometers, inclinometers, and GPS enable rapid detection of slope movements. Automated alert systems provide immediate response protocols, safeguarding lives and minimizing operational disruptions.
Post-Incident Response and Learning
Effective emergency response encompasses rapid evacuation, site stabilization, detailed assessment with drone technology, and transparent communication. Each incident informs future risk management strategies, enhancing overall safety.
Conclusion
Effective geotechnical risk management involves identifying hazards, meticulous data gathering, precise analysis, proactive stabilization measures, and swift emergency response. While uncertainty cannot be entirely eliminated, proactive strategies and robust monitoring provide essential control and confidence.
Subscribe to newsletter 
Follow K-MINE on LinkedIn